Un étudiant en cinéma, obsédé par le film Grave Encounters, part avec ses amis visiter lhôpital psychiatrique décrit dans le film original.
Bande-annonce
Casting
Shawn C. Phillips
Vlogger
Jennica Fulton
Vlogger
Jeffrey Bowyer-Chapman
Vlogger
Charlie Kerr
Vlogger
Francisco Passuelo
Vlogger
Andrew Amphlett
Vlogger
J. Jones
Vlogger
Mike Holtz
Vlogger
Calvin Walantus
Vlogger
Zach Lorkiewicz
Vlogger
Chris Hill
Vlogger
Brandon Christensen
Vlogger
Tessa Paige Bildstein
Vlogger
Simone Belshaw
Vlogger
Nikkie Mucci
Vlogger
Matt Longwell
Vlogger
Richard Harmon
Alex Wright
Dylan Playfair
Trevor Thompson
Vous aimerez aussi
Infidelity in Suburbia
Blood and Snow
Premier contact
The Midnight Club
Nancy Drew
The Hidden Moon
School Tales: La série
Tierra Incógnita
Enigma Black Stage
Chupkotha 2
Tierra Incógnita
Bates Motel
The Beauty
Wayward Pines
Servant
Son: The Guest
Scream Queens
Teen Wolf
Fatal Seduction
The Originals
Power
Legacies
XO, Kitty
Grimm
Commentaires
10 commentaires
source: Grave Encounters 2
As good as "Grave Encounters" was, "Grave Encounters 2" was that bad. It was a complete joke. You know a movie is bad when you're saying to yourself, "Won't they just hurry up and get killed so this nightmare can be over?" Every aspect of the film was a miserable failure. The story. "Grave Encounters" is an actual movie in the movie! Some film students decide to go to the location of "Grave Encounters" in order to "find out the truth." And the main character, Alex (Richard Harmon), is being directed by e-mails from a mysterious person named "Death Awaits". They used some absurd reason to drum up a part two. "Oh, lets go back to the creepy psych ward because it's all true and we have to prove it." So lame. The script. Cheap. Should've been flushed. The dialog in there was so sophomoric. The acting. Terrible. Part of the lure of the first "Grave Encounters" was the believability of it. Each character made sense and each character played their role well. In this movie these characters made zero sense and they put on like they were trying to be clichés. The directing. I'm going to blame this on directing because I don't know who else to blame. Once you've realized that you are no longer in Kansas Dorothy shouldn't the cameras be the least of your worries? Do you really need to continue to film EVERYTHING! And that's one of the serious drawbacks of found footage films. There comes a point when it doesn't even follow human behavior to keep filming things. The entire production. It was virtually a re-shoot of the first GE with a few little tweaks that were more harmful than helpful. There was nothing new (worth being in the movie), nothing fresh, nothing redeemable. It was lazy and pretty much like the majority of sequels: stale and uninspired.
I couldn't wait to see this film as I loved the first, so I had high hopes for the sequel.....and I wasn't disappointed. This was brilliant as it used the first movie and made fun of it to the advantage of this one. It was tongue and cheek and as you watch you're left thinking that this film isn't going to be as good as the original, and how are they going to tie them together, but then you find out how and it takes on a whole other element. This sequel is just as good as the first, and in fact it may be better in some ways. The story is set years after the first and it explains more of the original, and there's a nice little surprise halfway through. I highly recommend this film, and I give it a 9 out of 10.
Well this is when making a sequel to a decent movie goes wrong. The idea was there. How they go about searching for the truth behind "The Grave Encounters" was there. How the rest was executed was a "grave" disaster. It starts off in its own, but still in a "been there done that" way, then turns into the first movie, only to go downhill quick. Before too long your wondering why am I still watching this as it is not believable or even fathomable in an imaginary type way. I understand they had to do something different to end the movie than the first, but they should have gone back to the drawing boards once they screened this movie and seen how ridiculous it looked and sounded. The reasoning for the 3 of 10 rating is, it starts out good, and has decent special effects for a low budget movie. 3 of 10-WAIT FOR TV
I am new to the genre of horror. I qualify a horror movie by the amount of chills it gives me. This movie is a total trash. It's all the bad things American cinema represents. Everything is expected, as if the viewer of this movie has written the script himself. But besides that the acting was horrible. Sean Rogerson failed entirely to deliver a madman, Leanne Lap on the other side i think she was on her period when the movie was filmed. As for the special effects, from a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being the worst low budget movie and 10 the Avatar i would grade this movie 3. In conclusion this movie doesn't deliver in any way. Go waste your time elsewhere people, you don't have to punish yourself with this one.
The first Grave Encounters was a decent enough found footage horror flick that had just enough humor and jump scenes to make it a somewhat likable watch. This sequel follows a young filmmaker who is convinced the events depicted in the first Grave Encounters are real. He sets out with his crew in tow to make a documentary detailing his findings. The problem with Grave Encounters 2 is it has lost any cool or fun factor from the original. This is a pretty much a bland rehashing with new, boring characters in the same, now boring setting of a closed down hospital. The first Grave Encounters was a reminder that you can sometimes find something to like in a low budget, no name of a movie streaming on Netflix. Grave Encounters 2 is a reminder that most the low budget, no name movies streaming on Netflix suck.
